From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
eperezma@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, minhquangbui99@gmail.com,
bestswngs@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] virtio-net: fix len check in receive_big()
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:50:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178183021063.3143278.6923275972130325346.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616042837.2249468-1-xmei5@asu.edu>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 21:28:37 -0700 you wrote:
> receive_big() bounds the device-announced length by
> (big_packets_num_skbfrags + 1) * PAGE_SIZE. That is still too loose:
> add_recvbuf_big() sets sg[1] to start at offset
> sizeof(struct padded_vnet_hdr) into the first page, so the chain
> actually carries hdr_len + (PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(padded_vnet_hdr)) +
> big_packets_num_skbfrags * PAGE_SIZE bytes -- 20 bytes less than the
> check allows for the common hdr_len == 12 case.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v4] virtio-net: fix len check in receive_big()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/9e5ad06ea826
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 4:28 [PATCH net v4] virtio-net: fix len check in receive_big() Xiang Mei
2026-06-16 4:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-06-16 5:20 ` Xiang Mei
2026-06-16 14:43 ` Bui Quang Minh
2026-06-19 0:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178183021063.3143278.6923275972130325346.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minhquangbui99@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox