From: Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fuse: virtio-fs: stop new requests before draining queues
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 10:40:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179419200903.34516.7461247025134970821@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-203803@kernel.org>
Hi Sashiko,
Thanks for the review. Both Medium findings are valid; v3 fixes them
and adds the missing Fixes tag. The v3 patch is a separate thread.
#1 (-ENOSPC can bypass aborting)
Agreed. virtio_fs_enqueue_req() drops fsvq->lock before returning
-ENOSPC, and virtio_fs_send_req() queues the request in a second
critical section. Teardown can complete in between and leave the
request stranded on queued_reqs, which fuse_chan_abort() does not walk.
v3 re-checks connected/aborting in that second critical section, and in
the dispatch worker's -ENOSPC requeue path. A request now either joins
queued_reqs before aborting is set (and is counted in in_flight), or is
rejected with -ENOTCONN and ended through end_reqs. After aborting is
set, no request can newly enter queued_reqs or the virtqueue, except
FUSE_DESTROY.
I instrumented the window: enqueue returns -ENOSPC for a FUSE_STATFS,
send_req() waits before re-checking, and conn_destroy() sets aborting
and drains in that window. Three runs:
VF_INV: q=requests.0 in_flight=0 queued=0 connected=1 aborting=1
VF_ENOSPC: rejected
VF_ENOSPC: STATFS returned -107
VF_INV: q=requests.0 in_flight=0 queued=0 connected=0 aborting=1
umount rc=0
No stranded request, no warning.
#2 (dispatch worker may_block self-deadlock)
Agreed as well. Rejecting requests earlier means a DAX release can be
ended by virtio_fs_request_dispatch_work(); its end callback issues a
synchronous removemapping request, which is rejected and needs the same
worker.
v3 offloads endings with req->args->may_block to a separate work item
that only calls fuse_request_end(). virtio_fs_request_complete()
cannot be reused: it also consumes argbuf and drops in_flight, while a
rejected request has neither.
I verified the path with a synthetic callback: a background STATFS with
may_block=true and an end callback that issues a synchronous STATFS.
VF_DEADLOCK: queue outer
VF_DEADLOCK: offload may_block end
VF_DEADLOCK: outer end error=-107
VF_DEADLOCK: inner returned -107
VF_DEADLOCK: outer end done
umount rc=0
The old inline fuse_request_end() would stop at "outer end error" and
wait for itself.
#3 (missing Fixes)
Added:
Fixes: a62a8ef9d97d ("virtio-fs: add virtiofs filesystem")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Thanks,
Qihang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 13:58 [PATCH v2] fuse: virtio-fs: stop new requests before draining queues Qihang
2026-11-08 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 2:40 ` Qihang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179419200903.34516.7461247025134970821@gmail.com \
--to=q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox