From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, pazke@donpac.ru
Subject: Re: A proposal - binary
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 12:47:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060805104735.GS25692@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608050001.52535.ak@suse.de>
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:01:52AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> There is no reason Summit or es7000 or any other subarchitecture
> would need to do different virtualization. In fact these subarchitectures
> are pretty much obsolete by the generic subarchitecture and could be fully
> done by runtime switching.
>...
Has anyone measured the performance impact of rutime CLOCK_TICK_RATE
switching (since this will no longer allow some compile time
optimizations in jiffies.h)?
> -Andi
cu
Adrian
--
Gentoo kernels are 42 times more popular than SUSE kernels among
KLive users (a service by SUSE contractor Andrea Arcangeli that
gathers data about kernels from many users worldwide).
There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics.
Benjamin Disraeli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-05 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <44D1CC7D.4010600@vmware.com>
[not found] ` <20060803190605.GB14237@kroah.com>
[not found] ` <44D24DD8.1080006@vmware.com>
[not found] ` <20060803200136.GB28537@kroah.com>
[not found] ` <20060804183448.GE11244@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
[not found] ` <44D3B0F0.2010409@vmware.com>
2006-08-04 21:26 ` A proposal - binary Alan Cox
2006-08-05 1:14 ` James Bottomley
2006-08-05 5:37 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-05 10:42 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-05 11:50 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-04 22:01 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-04 22:39 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-08-04 22:52 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-04 22:43 ` David Lang
2006-08-05 10:47 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-08-05 11:57 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-05 1:30 ` James Bottomley
2006-08-05 4:33 ` Zachary Amsden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060805104735.GS25692@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pazke@donpac.ru \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).