From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: A proposal - binary Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 12:47:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20060805104735.GS25692@stusta.de> References: <44D1CC7D.4010600@vmware.com> <20060804183448.GE11244@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <44D3B0F0.2010409@vmware.com> <200608050001.52535.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608050001.52535.ak@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Andrew Morton , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Christoph Hellwig , Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Linus Torvalds , James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, pazke@donpac.ru List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:01:52AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > = > There is no reason Summit or es7000 or any other subarchitecture = > would need to do different virtualization. In fact these subarchitecture= s = > are pretty much obsolete by the generic subarchitecture and could be fully > done by runtime switching. >... Has anyone measured the performance impact of rutime CLOCK_TICK_RATE = switching (since this will no longer allow some compile time = optimizations in jiffies.h)? > -Andi cu Adrian -- = Gentoo kernels are 42 times more popular than SUSE kernels among KLive users (a service by SUSE contractor Andrea Arcangeli that gathers data about kernels from many users worldwide). There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics. Benjamin Disraeli