From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Per-cpu patches on top of PDA stuff... Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:26:13 +0200 Message-ID: <200609191026.13483.ak@muc.de> References: <1158635617.21726.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1158653031.23629.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1158653031.23629.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: virtualization@lists.osdl.org Cc: Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Tuesday 19 September 2006 10:03, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 13:13 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, all, > > = > > Sorry this took so long, spent last week in Japan at OSDL conf then > > netconf. After several false starts, I ended up with a very simple > > implementation, which clashes significantly with your work since then > > 8(. I've pushed the patches anyway, but it's going to be significant > > work for me to re-merge them, so I wanted your feedback first. > = > OK, here's a patch against 2.6.18-rc6-mm2. Tested on UP and SMP. > Crashes on hotplugging CPU, but crashes in same way as before the patch > 8). The incremental patches are madness and unmergeable. = Can you please just do fresh patches with PDA stuff dropped first? = -Andi