From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Skip timer works.patch Date: 16 Nov 2006 08:23:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20061116072329.GA53473@muc.de> References: <45425976.3090508@vmware.com> <200610271416.12548.ak@suse.de> <4546669F.8020706@vmware.com> <20061030225016.GA95732@muc.de> <20061115080323.GK1397@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <455ACDEC.7010808@vmware.com> <20061115224053.GO1397@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <20061116032702.GH9579@bingen.suse.de> <20061115210630.94bf8824.akpm@osdl.org> <455C018F.9000304@vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:23:29 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <455C018F.9000304@vmware.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Zachary Amsden Cc: Andrew Morton , Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org > Or perhaps, leaf cutting ants - they only = > have a 50% success rate at holding on to the proper bits because they = > are unaware of the physical geometry of the leaf in relationship to the = > branch, so half the time they hold onto the wrong side, letting the = > leaf fall instead of bringing it back to the repository. That must it be. Perhaps they infected muc.de's mailserver. -Andi