From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Skip timer works.patch Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:47:22 +0100 Message-ID: <200611170547.22192.ak@suse.de> References: <20061027145650.GA37582@muc.de> <200611162046.04264.ak@suse.de> <20061116202429.GG1397@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20061116202429.GG1397@sequoia.sous-sol.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Chris Wright Cc: Andrew Morton , virtualization@lists.osdl.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thursday 16 November 2006 21:24, Chris Wright wrote: > * Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de) wrote: > > > > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1250: dl_main: Assertion `= (void *) ph-> > > > > p_vaddr =3D=3D _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed! > > = > > I started some bisecting... > > > it's already broken at more-generic-paravirtualization. Surprised > > me a little, i was suspecting the MMU changes. > = > Looks like the VDSO issue, paravirt is not compatible if COMPAT_VDSO. So you're not planning to support old user land with paravirt? = Wouldn't it be better to just disable the vDSO completely then? At least all old binaries would work then. > I expect you'll get the same if you disable COMPAT_VDSO on native build? Yes. This is a older SUSE 9.0 image. -Andi