From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Section mismatch in parainstructions Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:21:17 +0100 Message-ID: <200612120421.17639.ak@suse.de> References: <20061210155821.d2c5dfa5.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20061210155821.d2c5dfa5.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: virtualization@lists.osdl.org Cc: Randy Dunlap , akpm , sam@ravnborg.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Monday 11 December 2006 00:58, Randy Dunlap wrote: > = > Is it OK for section .parainstructions to reference > exit.text? Yes it's ok because /* .exit.text is discard at runtime, not link time, to deal with references from .altinstructions and .eh_frame */ Same applies to paravirtops patching. -Andi