From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Why disable vdso by default with CONFIG_PARAVIRT? Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:01:08 +0100 Message-ID: <200612121301.08444.ak@suse.de> References: <457E0460.4030107@goop.org> <200612120827.56363.ak@suse.de> <457E830D.6010801@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <457E830D.6010801@goop.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Virtualization Mailing List List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Tuesday 12 December 2006 11:23, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Will your system boot with vdso=3D0 on the kernel command line? Sure, it's the same as what I did by default. > Presumably it will boot paravirt-native without it (since native makes > no claims on the address space), so its something you could put in your > Xen config file, no? I don't think being incompatible to old binaries is a sensible default. That is why I changed the wrong default. If paravirt ops cannot supply a compatible vdso it has to do without one. -Andi