From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch 04/21] Xen-paravirt: =================================================================== Date: 16 Feb 2007 10:12:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20070216091207.GA28196@muc.de> References: <20070216022449.739760547@goop.org> <20070216022530.755967483@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:12:07 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070216022530.755967483@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Zachary Amsden , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject? description? On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:24:53PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > -static void vmi_set_pte_present(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte) > +static void vmi_set_pte_present(struct mm_struct *mm, u32 addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte) And what good is that change anyways? unsigned long is the usual style for addresses. -Andi