From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wright Subject: Re: [patch 03/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: use paravirt_nop to consistently mark no-op operations Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:18:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20070316221834.GQ10574@sequoia.sous-sol.org> References: <20070301232443.195603797@goop.org> <20070301232526.261284776@goop.org> <20070316094432.GU23174@elte.hu> <45FAE560.10401@goop.org> <20070316194904.GO10574@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <45FAF77A.8010607@goop.org> <20070316215916.GP10574@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <45FB15E8.4080406@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45FB15E8.4080406@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Zachary Amsden , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wright , Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org * Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@goop.org) wrote: > Chris Wright wrote: > > I mean like this (bunch of work, for a type check that we're really ignoring > > anwyay, but this is the idea...) > > Oh, I see. I think this is the best argument yet for the current > arrangement... Heh, like I said it's a bunch of work for literally nothing ;-)