virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [patch 0/2] softlockup watchdog improvements
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:38:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070327053816.881735237@goop.org> (raw)

Here's couple of patches to improve the softlockup watchdog.

The first changes the softlockup timer from using jiffies to sched_clock()
as a timebase.  Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as counting unstolen
time, so time stolen by the hypervisor won't cause the watchdog to bite.

The second adds per-cpu enable flags for the watchdog timer.  This allows
the timer to be disabled when the CPU goes into a (potentially unbounded)
tickless sleep.

I know this conflicts with
fix-bogus-softlockup-warning-with-sysrq-t.patch in -mm2.  I think that
patch incorrectly changes the behaviour of the softlockup watchdog,
and a better solution is to temporarily disable the watchdog while
doing something known to be cpu-consuming, like a long sysreq output.

	J
-- 

             reply	other threads:[~2007-03-27  5:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-27  5:38 Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-03-27  5:38 ` [patch 1/2] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-27  7:00   ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-27  7:12     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-27  7:50       ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-27 14:39   ` Prarit Bhargava
2007-03-27 16:37     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-27 16:53       ` Prarit Bhargava
2007-03-27 17:10         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-27 17:20           ` Prarit Bhargava
2007-03-27  5:38 ` [patch 2/2] percpu enable flag for " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-27 14:42   ` Prarit Bhargava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070327053816.881735237@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).