From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: [patch 07/20] Allow paravirt backend to choose kernel PMD sharing Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 19:36:59 -0700 Message-ID: <20070409023659.GS2986@holomorphy.com> References: <20070404191151.009821039@goop.org> <20070404191205.392155702@goop.org> <20070406164139.08cd343b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4616DFB2.4020802@goop.org> <20070406172844.12f7b8e7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070406172844.12f7b8e7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Andi Kleen , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, lkml , Zachary Amsden , Christoph Lameter , Ingo Molnar List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 17:02:58 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> You're too kind. wli's comment on the first version of this patch was >> something along the lines of "this patch causes a surprising amount of >> damage for what little it achieves". On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 05:28:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Damn, I wish I'd said that. ISTR it went: On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 02:21:07PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > The amount of violence this patch manages to commit is phenomenal for > what little it actually does. There are also a number of oddities Cheers. -- wli