From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/28] i386: map enough initial memory to create lowmem mappings Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:04:00 +0200 Message-ID: <200704192304.01053.ak@suse.de> References: <20070414204154.871250608@goop.org> <200704192250.52633.ak@suse.de> <4627D756.5020405@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4627D756.5020405@zytor.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: lkml , Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Chuck Ebbert , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thursday 19 April 2007 22:55:50 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >> Is some version of this going in for 2.6.21, or is it not a real problem? > > > > When it's only seen with Xen it's not a real problem right now. > > It's not just seen only with Xen, though. It will affect all kernels in > a particular range of sizes, and we have ordinary kernels covering that > range (in fact, Xen hardly affects size in that way.) Then we would have seen reports surely? -Andi