From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Paravirt: fix export of paravirt-ops to binary modules Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:49:43 +0200 Message-ID: <200704230149.44137.ak@suse.de> References: <20070420015214.6834BBFC@zach-dev2.vmware.com> <46293266.9020306@vmware.com> <1177285027.17026.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1177285027.17026.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: Andrew Morton , Chaz Masden , Petr Vandrovec , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Chris Wright , Virtualization Mailing List , Ingo Molnar List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org > Less exports good. Consistency with all config options isn't a hard > requirement: I'd be tempted not to export the pte functions. Yes paravirt_ops should be probably split into two for internal and external available functions. Any takers? -Andi