From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [patch 8/9] lguest: the block driver Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 12:54:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20070509105431.GT4163@kernel.dk> References: <200705090951.l499pdsc020409@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <84144f020705090322jc37884drc31b97879648d09@mail.gmail.com> <20070509102933.GR4163@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pekka J Enberg Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ak@suse.de, Rene Herman List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, May 09 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Lets do it after it is merged, as not to create a hold-up point for > > lguest. Once it's in, I'll fix it up. > > Ok. Seems pointless, though, as it's only a matter of: Yes I'm very well aware of that, my point is just that I'll do it once lguest is merged since then a) it has a user, and b) I don't want lguest to wait for me to get that update pulled Can we please let this rest? -- Jens Axboe