From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [patch 4/9] lguest: the asm offsets Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:59:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20070611125903.GA3933@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <200705090951.l499pa6G020397@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20070509204613.GA10336@uranus.ravnborg.org> <1178755780.7286.175.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Oleg Verych Cc: Rusty Russell , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, ak@suse.de List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:49:32PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > * Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:09:39 +1000 > > > > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 22:46 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:51:36AM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > >> > From: Rusty Russell > >> > > >> > This is the structure offsets required by lg.ko's switcher.S. > >> > > >> > Unfortunately we don't have infrastructure for private asm-offsets > >> > creation. > >> Someone maybe it was Oleg? did an OK job to abstract out asm-offset > >> generation. I asked to have it rebased but never heard anything back. > >> > >> I would like to get this generic approach in and then let lguest use it. > >> But I do not see this as a reason to hold back inclusion in -linus. > > > > Hi Sam, > > > > Yeah, I never heard back either. And I'm reluctant to try to fix it > > myself: I've never managed to patch the build system without causing you > > to rewrite it better 8) > > If it's still open, i can try, after getting back from RL and 28k LKML > backlog ;) Hi Olg. Please do so. Thanks, Sam