From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Virtio draft IV: the net driver Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070711.192609.18580123.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200707111245.40717.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <20070711.134447.39159166.davem@davemloft.net> <1184206893.6005.669.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1184206893.6005.669.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cotte@de.ibm.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org From: Rusty Russell Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:21:33 +1000 > Dave, I think you're the only one (so far?) with multiple irqs. Luckily there are known hw implementations with that issue so I won't be weird for long :) > It's not clear that guest-controlled interrupt mitigation is the best > approach for virtual devices, but at the moment it doesn't hurt. It would be nice for consistency's sake, once it is easy to do so.