From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Virtio draft IV: the net driver Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:45:40 +0200 Message-ID: <200707111245.40717.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> References: <1183522348.6110.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1183522765.6110.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1183524053.6110.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1183524053.6110.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Carsten Otte , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 schrieb Rusty Russell: > +static void receive_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, [...] > + netif_rx(skb); In the NAPI case, we should use netif_receive_skb, no? Christian