From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:15:47 +0200
Message-ID: <20070822131547.GS32640@bingen.suse.de>
References: <46CBC842.4070100@vmware.com> <46CBCADF.2070400@qumranet.com> <1187763956.6174.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070822103545.GG2642@bingen.suse.de> <46CC0719.2080103@qumranet.com> <20070822110810.GO32640@bingen.suse.de> <46CC0EAF.3000805@qumranet.com> <20070822112352.GQ32640@bingen.suse.de> <46CC2766.7020602@qumranet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1760193AbXHVMWM@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <46CC2766.7020602@qumranet.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

> Ah.  But that's mostly modules, so real in-core changes should be very 

Yes that's the big difference. Near all paravirt ops are concentrated
on the core kernel, but this one affects lots of people.

And why "but"? -- modules are as important as the core kernel. They're
not second citizens.

-Andi