From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:20:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070824122025.GA3886@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46CBD1A5.8070702@vmware.com>
Hi!
> >>In general, I/O in a virtual guest is subject to
> >>performance problems. The I/O can not be completed
> >>physically, but must be virtualized. This
> >>means trapping and decoding port I/O instructions from
> >>the guest OS. Not only is the trap for a #GP
> >>heavyweight, both in the processor and
> >>the hypervisor (which usually has a complex #GP path),
> >>but this forces
> >>the hypervisor to decode the individual instruction
> >>which has faulted. Worse, even with hardware assist
> >>such as VT, the exit reason alone is
> >>not sufficient to determine the true nature of the
> >>faulting instruction,
> >>requiring a complex and costly instruction decode and
> >>simulation.
> >>
> >>This patch provides hypercalls for the i386 port I/O
> >>instructions, which
> >>vastly helps guests which use native-style drivers.
> >>For certain VMI
> >>workloads, this provides a performance boost of up to
> >>30%. We expect
> >>KVM and lguest to be able to achieve similar gains on
> >>I/O intensive
> >>workloads.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >What about cost on hardware?
> >
>
> On modern hardware, port I/O is about the most expensive
> thing you can do. The extra function call cost is
> totally masked by the stall. We have measured with port
> I/O converted like this on real hardware, and have seen
> zero measurable impact on macro-benchmarks.
> Micro-benchmarks that generate massively repeated port
> I/O might show some effect on ancient hardware, but I
> can't even imagine a workload which does such a thing,
> other than a polling port I/O loop perhaps - which would
> not be performance critical in any case I can reasonably
> imagine.
SCSI controller in ISA slot? IDE without DMA enabled?
Yes, those are performance-critical. The second case seems common with
compactflash cards.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-24 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-22 5:23 [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt Zachary Amsden
2007-08-22 5:34 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-22 5:40 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-08-22 8:37 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-22 16:16 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-08-22 6:25 ` Rusty Russell
2007-08-22 10:35 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-22 9:51 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-22 11:08 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-22 10:23 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-22 11:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-22 12:09 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-22 13:15 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-22 12:32 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-22 16:11 ` Jeff Garzik
[not found] ` <1188237281.5972.69.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <46D3C60B.3050605@vmware.com>
2007-08-28 11:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-22 6:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-22 6:03 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-08-24 12:20 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-08-22 10:22 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-22 16:48 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-08-22 17:59 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-22 17:07 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-08-22 19:46 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-22 20:43 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-08-22 22:04 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-22 21:25 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-22 21:41 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-08-23 5:34 ` Rusty Russell
2007-08-22 21:45 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-08-22 17:34 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-22 21:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-08-22 22:15 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2007-08-22 22:20 ` Chris Wright
2007-08-22 22:29 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2007-08-22 22:34 ` Chris Wright
2007-08-22 23:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-08-23 0:47 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-23 0:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-08-23 2:34 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070824122025.GA3886@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).