From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:22:58 -0800 Message-ID: <20071113232258.GA10338@kroah.com> References: <20071015204840.074767068@goop.org> <20071015215406.GA1588@kroah.com> <4713E2D6.90801@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4713E2D6.90801@goop.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Linus Torvalds , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, LKML , Andi Kleen , Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Andrew Morton , Keir Fraser , Stable Kernel List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:59:50PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > Yeah, but you cc:ed all 12 patches to stable@. The majority of which we > > don't want to take, right? Which specific ones should stable@ care > > about? > > Crap, sorry about that. I'd just intended to send the overview and the > four patches, which have explicit CC: stable lines in the patch > descriptions. They are: > > Subject: [PATCH 06/12] xen: add batch completion callbacks > Subject: [PATCH 07/12] xen: deal with stale cr3 values when unpinning > pagetables > Subject: [PATCH 10/12] xen: fix incorrect vcpu_register_vcpu_info > hypercall argument > Subject: [PATCH 12/12] xfs: eagerly remove vmap mappings to avoid > upsetting Xen These don't apply now due to the x86 merge. Care to backport them and send them to the stable@kernel.org address so we can apply them properly? thanks, greg k-h