From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use PCI revision field to indicate virtio PCI ABI version Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:10:26 +1100 Message-ID: <200801302210.26874.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1201535999-13998-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <200801292338.03916.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <479F4E5E.6070909@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <479F4E5E.6070909@us.ibm.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Anthony Liguori Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wednesday 30 January 2008 03:03:42 Anthony Liguori wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 January 2008 19:03:26 Avi Kivity wrote: > >> But that's done at the wrong level. Anthony agreed the revision ID > >> should indicate the device ABI, not just the virtio ABI. If we move to > >> that level, bumping just one device rev id on the host will break all > >> devices on the guest. > > > > OK, I'll drop it. > > Please pull in the patch again. That's OK: I lied, I never dropped it :) Cheers, Rusty.