virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, x86@kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:10:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080620101028.GA23664@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080619164708.GA32190@elte.hu>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> 
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > Below is the commit, it needed a small amount of massaging to apply the 
> > > void * -> unsigned long * change in the x86/bitops topic.
> > 
> > Well, that's your bug right there.
> > 
> > The macros very much depended on the pointers being "void *", due to 
> > the pointer arithmetic (which is a gcc extension that we use 
> > extensively - "void *" arithmetic works as if it was a byte 
> > pointer).
> 
> duh, yeah - of course. Will retry with that fixed :)

yep, the patch below got it all going and it passed 5 hours of testing 
already. Thanks,

	Ingo

------------------->
commit 7dbceaf9bb68919651901b101f44edd5391ee489
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date:   Fri Jun 20 07:28:24 2008 +0200

    x86, bitops: make constant-bit set/clear_bit ops faster, adapt, clean up
    
    fix integration bug introduced by "x86: bitops take an unsigned long *"
    which turned "(void *) + x" into "(long *) + x".
    
    small cleanups to make it more apparent which value get propagated where.
    
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

diff --git a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
index ab7635a..6c50548 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
@@ -28,16 +28,15 @@
 #define BITOP_ADDR(x) "+m" (*(volatile long *) (x))
 #endif
 
-#define ADDR BITOP_ADDR(addr)
+#define ADDR				BITOP_ADDR(addr)
 
 /*
  * We do the locked ops that don't return the old value as
  * a mask operation on a byte.
  */
-#define IS_IMMEDIATE(nr) \
-	(__builtin_constant_p(nr))
-#define CONST_MASK_ADDR BITOP_ADDR(addr + (nr>>3))
-#define CONST_MASK (1 << (nr & 7))
+#define IS_IMMEDIATE(nr)		(__builtin_constant_p(nr))
+#define CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)	BITOP_ADDR((void *)(addr) + ((nr)>>3))
+#define CONST_MASK(nr)			(1 << ((nr) & 7))
 
 /**
  * set_bit - Atomically set a bit in memory
@@ -56,13 +55,17 @@
  */
 static inline void set_bit(unsigned int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
 {
-	if (IS_IMMEDIATE(nr))
-		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "orb %1,%0" : CONST_MASK_ADDR : "i" (CONST_MASK) : "memory");
-	else
-		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "bts %1,%0" : ADDR : "Ir" (nr) : "memory");
+	if (IS_IMMEDIATE(nr)) {
+		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "orb %1,%0"
+			: CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)
+			: "i" (CONST_MASK(nr))
+			: "memory");
+	} else {
+		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "bts %1,%0"
+			: BITOP_ADDR(addr) : "Ir" (nr) : "memory");
+	}
 }
 
-
 /**
  * __set_bit - Set a bit in memory
  * @nr: the bit to set
@@ -89,10 +92,15 @@ static inline void __set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
  */
 static inline void clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
 {
-	if (IS_IMMEDIATE(nr))
-		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "andb %1,%0" : CONST_MASK_ADDR : "i" (~CONST_MASK));
-	else
-		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "btr %1,%0" : ADDR : "Ir" (nr));
+	if (IS_IMMEDIATE(nr)) {
+		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "andb %1,%0"
+			: CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)
+			: "i" (~CONST_MASK(nr)));
+	} else {
+		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "btr %1,%0"
+			: BITOP_ADDR(addr)
+			: "Ir" (nr));
+	}
 }
 
 /*

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-20 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-16 11:29 [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction (take 2) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 17:29   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-16 18:13     ` Hugh Dickins
2008-06-16 18:49       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-18 23:23   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-18 23:59     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19  0:15       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19  0:24         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19  0:37           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19  0:49             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19  4:03               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19 11:58                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 12:03                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 12:20                   ` Akinobu Mita
2008-06-19 16:30                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19 16:47                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 10:10                       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-06-20 19:06                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-20 19:15                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-20 19:56                             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 20:03                               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-20 20:16                                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-20 20:22                                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-21  6:06                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 20:05                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19  0:39           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-19  5:03             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-19  7:20               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-19 17:57                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 2 of 4] paravirt: add hooks for ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 3 of 4] xen: implement ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 4 of 4] xen: add mechanism to extend existing multicalls Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-31  0:04 [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction (take 2) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-31  0:04 ` [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-02 11:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-02 11:57     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080620101028.GA23664@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).