From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.osdl.org, frankeh@watson.ibm.com,
akpm@osdl.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, hugh@veritas.com
Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] Guest page hinting: writable page table entries.
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:36:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090401163658.60f851ed@skybase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D36B4E.7000702@redhat.com>
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:25:34 -0400
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> This code has me stumped. Does it mean that if a page already
> has the PageWritable bit set (and count_ok stays 0), we will
> always mark the page as volatile?
>
> How does that work out on !s390?
No, we will not always mark the page as volatile. If PG_writable is
already set count_ok will stay 0 and a call to page_make_volatile is
done. This differs from page_set_volatile as it repeats all the
required checks, then calls page_set_volatile with a PageWritable(page)
as second argument. What state the page will get depends on the
architecture definition of page_set_volatile. For s390 this will do a
state transition to potentially volatile as the PG_writable bit is set.
On architecture that cannot check the dirty bit on a physical page basis
you need to make the page stable.
> > /**
> > + * __page_check_writable() - check page state for new writable pte
> > + *
> > + * @page: the page the new writable pte refers to
> > + * @pte: the new writable pte
> > + */
> > +void __page_check_writable(struct page *page, pte_t pte, unsigned int offset)
> > +{
> > + int count_ok = 0;
> > +
> > + preempt_disable();
> > + while (page_test_set_state_change(page))
> > + cpu_relax();
> > +
> > + if (!TestSetPageWritable(page)) {
> > + count_ok = check_counts(page, offset);
> > + if (check_bits(page) && count_ok)
> > + page_set_volatile(page, 1);
> > + else
> > + /*
> > + * If two processes create a write mapping at the
> > + * same time check_counts will return false or if
> > + * the page is currently isolated from the LRU
> > + * check_bits will return false but the page might
> > + * be in volatile state.
> > + * We have to take care about the dirty bit so the
> > + * only option left is to make the page stable but
> > + * we can try to make it volatile a bit later.
> > + */
> > + page_set_stable_if_present(page);
> > + }
> > + page_clear_state_change(page);
> > + if (!count_ok)
> > + page_make_volatile(page, 1);
> > + preempt_enable();
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__page_check_writable);
>
>
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-01 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 15:09 [patch 0/6] Guest page hinting version 7 Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-27 15:09 ` [patch 1/6] Guest page hinting: core + volatile page cache Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-27 22:57 ` Rik van Riel
2009-03-29 13:56 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-29 14:35 ` Rik van Riel
2009-03-27 15:09 ` [patch 2/6] Guest page hinting: volatile swap cache Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-01 2:10 ` Rik van Riel
2009-04-01 8:13 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-27 15:09 ` [patch 3/6] Guest page hinting: mlocked pages Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-01 2:52 ` Rik van Riel
2009-04-01 8:13 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-27 15:09 ` [patch 4/6] Guest page hinting: writable page table entries Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-01 13:25 ` Rik van Riel
2009-04-01 14:36 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2009-04-01 14:45 ` Rik van Riel
2009-03-27 15:09 ` [patch 5/6] Guest page hinting: minor fault optimization Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-01 15:33 ` Rik van Riel
2009-03-27 15:09 ` [patch 6/6] Guest page hinting: s390 support Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-01 16:18 ` Rik van Riel
2009-03-27 23:03 ` [patch 0/6] Guest page hinting version 7 Dave Hansen
2009-03-28 0:06 ` Rik van Riel
2009-03-29 14:20 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-29 14:38 ` Rik van Riel
2009-03-29 14:12 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-30 15:54 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-30 16:34 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-30 18:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-30 18:42 ` Rik van Riel
2009-03-30 18:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-30 20:02 ` Rik van Riel
2009-03-30 20:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-30 21:38 ` Dor Laor
2009-03-30 22:16 ` Izik Eidus
2009-03-28 6:35 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-29 14:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-02 11:32 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-02 15:52 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-02 16:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-02 16:23 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-02 19:06 ` Rik van Riel
2009-04-02 19:22 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-02 20:05 ` Rik van Riel
2009-04-03 0:50 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-02 19:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-02 20:14 ` Rik van Riel
2009-04-02 20:34 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-03 8:49 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-03 18:19 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-06 7:21 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-06 7:32 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-06 19:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-02 19:27 ` Hugh Dickins
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-12 13:21 [patch 0/6] Guest page hinting version 6 Martin Schwidefsky
2008-03-12 13:21 ` [patch 4/6] Guest page hinting: writable page table entries Martin Schwidefsky
2008-03-12 23:35 ` Rusty Russell
2008-03-13 9:11 ` Martin Schwidefsky
[not found] <20070628164049.118610355@de.ibm.com>
2007-06-28 16:40 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-05-11 13:58 [patch 0/6] [rfc] guest page hinting version 5 Martin Schwidefsky
2007-05-11 13:58 ` [patch 4/6] Guest page hinting: writable page table entries Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090401163658.60f851ed@skybase \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).