From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, virtualization@lists.osdl.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen block: remove driver_data direct access of struct device
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:37:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090430223757.GB16369@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090430223535.GO3036@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 03:35:35PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Greg Kroah-Hartman (gregkh@suse.de) wrote:
> > In the near future, the driver core is going to not allow direct access
> > to the driver_data pointer in struct device. Instead, the functions
> > dev_get_drvdata() and dev_set_drvdata() should be used. These functions
> > have been around since the beginning, so are backwards compatible with
> > all older kernel versions.
> >
> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > Cc: virtualization@lists.osdl.org
> > Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
> > Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
>
> Acked-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Thanks, will add it. Any objections for this to go through my
driver-core tree to Linus for 2.6.31?
> after...
>
> > - dev->dev.driver_data = NULL;
> > + dev_det_drvdata(&dev->dev, NULL);
>
> ...fixing your fingers/script so it compiles ;-)
Doh!
And here I thought I had built that one, I guess I hadn't, my mistake.
Thanks for catching that, I've now fixed it.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-30 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-30 22:24 [PATCH] xen block: remove driver_data direct access of struct device Greg Kroah-Hartman
2009-04-30 22:35 ` Chris Wright
2009-04-30 22:37 ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-04-30 22:43 ` Chris Wright
2009-04-30 23:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-30 23:38 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090430223757.GB16369@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).