From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: find_vqs operation starting at arbitrary index
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:32:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090602163227.GC6827@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906020853.07559.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:53:07AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 05:33:48 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The recent find_vqs operation doesn't allow for a vq to be found at an
> > arbitrary location; it's meant to be called once at startup to find all
> > possible queues and never called again.
> >
> > This doesn't work for devices which can have queues hot-plugged at
> > run-time. This can be made to work by passing the 'start_index' value as
> > was done earlier for find_vq, but I doubt something like the following
> > will work. The MSI vectors might need some changing as well.
>
> There's a fundamental conflict here: find_vqs was added so the PCI MSI code
> knows exactly how many virtqueues there are.
>
> So you'll need to sort this out with Michael...
>
> Thanks,
> Rusty.
I'd like to understand the expected usage some more. If there's still a
small # of hotpluggable queues known in advance, you can request all
vectors but have the queues disabled, and then enable as queues arrive.
In that case, something like resize_queue or enable_queue might be a
good idea.
OTOH, if you want to have a potentially unlimited number of queues,
you will have to allocate a common vector for all of them
as on intel we are limited to 256 total vectors for all devices
taken together. Not sure what a good API for that would be.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-02 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-01 8:03 find_vqs operation starting at arbitrary index Amit Shah
2009-06-01 8:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-01 8:35 ` Amit Shah
2009-06-01 8:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-01 8:51 ` Amit Shah
2009-06-01 9:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-01 9:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-01 23:23 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-02 16:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-06-02 17:09 ` Amit Shah
2009-06-02 17:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090602163227.GC6827@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).