From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [patch 00/54] [Announce] Microsoft Hyper-V drivers for Linux Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:15:23 -0400 Message-ID: <20090720171523.GA16129@redhat.com> References: <20090720160025.GA20249@kroah.com> <20090720162810.GA22102@kroah.com> <20090720165941.GA15660@redhat.com> <20090720170911.GS12833@kiste.smurf.noris.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090720170911.GS12833@kiste.smurf.noris.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthias Urlichs Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Hank Janssen , Haiyang Zhang , Sam Ramji , shemminger@linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 07:09:11PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, > > Dave Jones: > > Given the numerous cleanup patches that already exist, is there any reason > > to not just post the cleaned up drivers ? It would certainly be more > > reviewable than the current pile. > > > Feel free to apply / combinediff these patches before reviewing. :-P > > Personally, I don't want to ever see another patch where substantial > changes (for some nontrivial value of "substantial") are intermixed > with distracting s/\/bool/g cleanups. 'Substantial changes' doesn't matter when it's an initial submission. By its nature, it's a substantial change. Dave