From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/28] virtio: console: Buffer data that comes in from the host
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:14:20 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912021414.20206.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259391051-7752-13-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com>
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:20:35 pm Amit Shah wrote:
> The console could be flooded with data from the host; handle
> this situation by buffering the data.
All this complexity makes me really wonder if we should just
have the host say the max # ports it will ever use, and just do this
really dumbly. Yes, it's a limitation, but it'd be much simpler.
> --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,23 @@ struct ports_device {
> * interrupt
> */
> struct work_struct rx_work;
> +
> + struct list_head unused_read_head;
You should name lists after plurals, rather than using "head" which is
an implementation detail. eg. "queued_inbufs" and below "used_inbufs".
Though Shirly Ma was working on a "destroy_bufs" patch which would avoid
your need for this list at all, AFAICT.
> + /* Return the number of bytes actually copied */
> + ret = copy_size;
> + buf->offset += ret;
> + out_offset += ret;
> + out_count -= ret;
We don't actually use ret.
> + if (buf->len - buf->offset == 0) {
I prefer the simpler "if (buf->offset == buf->len)" myself.
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&port->readbuf_list_lock, flags);
> + list_del(&buf->list);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->readbuf_list_lock, flags);
> + kfree(buf->buf);
> + kfree(buf);
Does it become cleaner later to have this in a separate function? Usually
I prefer matching alloc and free fns.
> +static struct port_buffer *get_buf(size_t buf_size)
> +{
> + struct port_buffer *buf;
> +
> + buf = kzalloc(sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buf)
> + goto out;
> + buf->buf = kzalloc(buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buf->buf) {
> + kfree(buf);
> + goto out;
No, that would return non-NULL. I'd stick with the standard multi-part exit:
if (!buf)
goto fail;
buf->buf = kzalloc(buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf->buf)
goto fail_free_buf;
buf->len = buf_size;
return buf;
fail_free_buf:
kfree(buf);
fail:
return NULL;
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-02 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-28 6:50 [PATCH 00/28] virtio: console: Fixes, support for generic ports Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 01/28] virtio: console: comment cleanup Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 02/28] virtio: console: statically initialize virtio_cons Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 03/28] hvc_console: make the ops pointer const Amit Shah
[not found] ` <1259391051-7752-4-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com>
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 04/28] virtio: console: We support only one device at a time Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 05/28] virtio: console: port encapsulation Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 06/28] virtio: console: use vdev->priv to avoid accessing global var Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 07/28] virtio: console: don't assume a single console port Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 08/28] virtio: console: remove global var Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 09/28] virtio: console: struct ports for multiple ports per device Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 10/28] virtio: console: ensure console size is updated on hvc open Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 11/28] virtio: console: Introduce a workqueue for handling host->guest notifications Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 12/28] virtio: console: Buffer data that comes in from the host Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 13/28] virtio: console: Create a buffer pool for sending data to host Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 14/28] virtio: console: Separate out console-specific data into a separate struct Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 15/28] virtio: console: Separate out console init into a new function Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 16/28] virtio: console: Introduce a 'header' for each buffer towards supporting multiport Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 17/28] virtio: console: Add a new MULTIPORT feature, support for generic ports Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 18/28] virtio: console: Associate each port with a char device Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 19/28] virtio: console: Prepare for writing to / reading from userspace buffers Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 20/28] virtio: console: Add file operations to ports for open/read/write/poll Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 21/28] virtio: console: Ensure only one process can have a port open at a time Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 22/28] virtio: console: Register with sysfs and create a 'name' attribute for ports Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 23/28] virtio: console: Add throttling support to prevent flooding ports Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 24/28] virtio: console: Add option to remove cached buffers on port close Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 25/28] virtio: console: Handle port hot-plug Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 26/28] hvc_console: Export (GPL'ed) hvc_remove Amit Shah
[not found] ` <1259391051-7752-27-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com>
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 27/28] virtio: console: Add ability to hot-unplug ports Amit Shah
2009-11-28 6:50 ` [PATCH 28/28] virtio: console: Add debugfs files for each port to expose debug info Amit Shah
2009-12-02 8:30 ` [PATCH 13/28] virtio: console: Create a buffer pool for sending data to host Rusty Russell
2009-12-02 9:19 ` Amit Shah
2009-12-02 3:44 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-12-02 9:24 ` [PATCH 12/28] virtio: console: Buffer data that comes in from the host Amit Shah
2009-12-02 22:54 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-03 3:43 ` Amit Shah
2009-12-04 11:02 ` Amit Shah
2009-12-08 1:16 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-15 10:45 ` Amit Shah
2009-12-15 22:55 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-30 2:09 ` [PATCH 09/28] virtio: console: struct ports for multiple ports per device Rusty Russell
2009-11-30 5:50 ` Amit Shah
2009-11-30 1:57 ` [PATCH 08/28] virtio: console: remove global var Rusty Russell
2009-11-30 5:45 ` Amit Shah
2009-11-30 1:50 ` [PATCH 07/28] virtio: console: don't assume a single console port Rusty Russell
2009-11-30 5:42 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912021414.20206.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=mashirle@us.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).