Re: [PATCH] vhost: fix typos in comment

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:48:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>

Applied, thanks.

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/net.c   |    2 +-
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.h |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index d10da28..14fc189 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static void handle_rx_mergeable(struct vhost_net *net)
>  			move_iovec_hdr(vq->iov, vq->hdr, vhost_hlen, in);
>  		else
>  			/* Copy the header for use in VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF:
> -			 * needed because sendmsg can modify msg_iov. */
> +			 * needed because recvmsg can modify msg_iov. */
>  			copy_iovec_hdr(vq->iov, vq->hdr, sock_hlen, in);
>  		msg.msg_iovlen = in;
>  		err = sock->ops->recvmsg(NULL, sock, &msg,
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> index 073d06a..2af44b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
>  	 * flush the vhost_work instead of synchronize_rcu. Therefore readers do
>  	 * not need to call rcu_read_lock/rcu_read_unlock: the beginning of
>  	 * vhost_work execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock() and the end of
> -	 * vhost_work execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock().
> +	 * vhost_work execution acts instead of rcu_read_unlock().
>  	 * Writers use virtqueue mutex. */
>  	void __rcu *private_data;
>  	/* Log write descriptors */