From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, dev@openvswitch.org,
virtualization@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Flow Control and Port Mirroring Revisited
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:38:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110120083727.GA1807@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D35ECE2.4040901@hp.com>
[ Trimmed Eric from CC list as vger was complaining that it is too long ]
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:41:22AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
> >So it won't be all that simple to implement well, and before we try,
> >I'd like to know whether there are applications that are helped
> >by it. For example, we could try to measure latency at various
> >pps and see whether the backpressure helps. netperf has -b, -w
> >flags which might help these measurements.
>
> Those options are enabled when one adds --enable-burst to the
> pre-compilation ./configure of netperf (one doesn't have to
> recompile netserver). However, if one is also looking at latency
> statistics via the -j option in the top-of-trunk, or simply at the
> histogram with --enable-histogram on the ./configure and a verbosity
> level of 2 (global -v 2) then one wants the very top of trunk
> netperf from:
Hi,
I have constructed a test where I run an un-paced UDP_STREAM test in
one guest and a paced omni rr test in another guest at the same time.
Breifly I get the following results from the omni test..
1. Omni test only: MEAN_LATENCY=272.00
2. Omni and stream test: MEAN_LATENCY=3423.00
3. cpu and net_cls group: MEAN_LATENCY=493.00
As per 2 plus cgoups are created for each guest
and guest tasks added to the groups
4. 100Mbit/s class: MEAN_LATENCY=273.00
As per 3 plus the net_cls groups each have a 100MBit/s HTB class
5. cpu.shares=128: MEAN_LATENCY=652.00
As per 4 plus the cpu groups have cpu.shares set to 128
6. Busy CPUS: MEAN_LATENCY=15126.00
As per 5 but the CPUs are made busy using a simple shell while loop
There is a bit of noise in the results as the two netperf invocations
aren't started at exactly the same moment
For reference, my netperf invocations are:
netperf -c -C -t UDP_STREAM -H 172.17.60.216 -l 12
netperf.omni -p 12866 -D -c -C -H 172.17.60.216 -t omni -j -v 2 -- -r 1 -d rr -k foo -b 1 -w 200 -m 200
foo contains
PROTOCOL
THROUGHPUT,THROUGHPUT_UNITS
LOCAL_SEND_THROUGHPUT
LOCAL_RECV_THROUGHPUT
REMOTE_SEND_THROUGHPUT
REMOTE_RECV_THROUGHPUT
RT_LATENCY,MIN_LATENCY,MEAN_LATENCY,MAX_LATENCY
P50_LATENCY,P90_LATENCY,P99_LATENCY,STDDEV_LATENCY
LOCAL_CPU_UTIL,REMOTE_CPU_UTIL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-20 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-06 9:33 Flow Control and Port Mirroring Revisited Simon Horman
2011-01-06 10:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-06 12:44 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-06 13:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-01-06 22:01 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-06 22:38 ` Jesse Gross
2011-01-07 1:23 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-10 9:31 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-13 6:47 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-13 15:45 ` Jesse Gross
2011-01-13 23:41 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-14 4:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-14 6:35 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-14 6:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-16 22:37 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-16 23:56 ` Rusty Russell
2011-01-17 10:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-17 10:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-18 19:41 ` Rick Jones
2011-01-18 20:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-18 21:28 ` Rick Jones
2011-01-19 9:11 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-20 8:38 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2011-01-21 2:30 ` Rick Jones
2011-01-21 9:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-21 18:04 ` Rick Jones
2011-01-21 23:11 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-22 21:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-23 6:38 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-23 10:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-23 13:53 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-24 18:27 ` Rick Jones
2011-01-24 18:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-24 19:01 ` Rick Jones
2011-01-24 19:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-06 10:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-06 11:30 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-06 12:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-01-06 12:29 ` Simon Horman
2011-01-06 12:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110120083727.GA1807@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=jesse@nicira.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).