* 2.6.40 event idx patches
@ 2011-05-24 9:23 Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-05-25 2:04 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2011-05-24 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: virtualization
Just checking: were you going to send the following to Linus for 2.6.40?
virtio:event_index_interface.patch
virtio:ring_inline_function_to_check_for_events.patch
virtio:ring_support_event_idx_feature.patch
misc:vhost_support_event_index.patch
virtio:test_support_event_index.patch
virtio:add_api_for_delayed_callbacks.patch
virtio:net_delay_tx_callbacks.patch
I certainly hope so as these modify both host and guest which makes
testing them out of tree hard for people.
Once stuff lands on Linus' tree we can patch
qemu and get more people to try out the patches.
Also, Linus said it's going to be a short window so ...
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.40 event idx patches
2011-05-24 9:23 2.6.40 event idx patches Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2011-05-25 2:04 ` Rusty Russell
2011-05-25 6:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-05-28 19:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2011-05-25 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: virtualization
On Tue, 24 May 2011 12:23:45 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> Just checking: were you going to send the following to Linus for 2.6.40?
> virtio:event_index_interface.patch
> virtio:ring_inline_function_to_check_for_events.patch
> virtio:ring_support_event_idx_feature.patch
> misc:vhost_support_event_index.patch
> virtio:test_support_event_index.patch
> virtio:add_api_for_delayed_callbacks.patch
> virtio:net_delay_tx_callbacks.patch
>
> I certainly hope so as these modify both host and guest which makes
> testing them out of tree hard for people.
> Once stuff lands on Linus' tree we can patch
> qemu and get more people to try out the patches.
>
> Also, Linus said it's going to be a short window so ...
Yes. They've been in linux-next since the weekend (ie. today will be the
third linux-next build), and my plan was to push them Friday.
Nothing goes into linux-next which is not for Linus until after Linus
closes the merge window.
I also want to find a few cycles to adapt lguest; it's *always* good to
have a second implementation.
Cheers,
Rusty.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.40 event idx patches
2011-05-25 2:04 ` Rusty Russell
@ 2011-05-25 6:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-05-28 19:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2011-05-25 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: virtualization
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:34:07AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 12:23:45 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Just checking: were you going to send the following to Linus for 2.6.40?
> > virtio:event_index_interface.patch
> > virtio:ring_inline_function_to_check_for_events.patch
> > virtio:ring_support_event_idx_feature.patch
> > misc:vhost_support_event_index.patch
> > virtio:test_support_event_index.patch
> > virtio:add_api_for_delayed_callbacks.patch
> > virtio:net_delay_tx_callbacks.patch
> >
> > I certainly hope so as these modify both host and guest which makes
> > testing them out of tree hard for people.
> > Once stuff lands on Linus' tree we can patch
> > qemu and get more people to try out the patches.
> >
> > Also, Linus said it's going to be a short window so ...
>
> Yes. They've been in linux-next since the weekend (ie. today will be the
> third linux-next build), and my plan was to push them Friday.
>
> Nothing goes into linux-next which is not for Linus until after Linus
> closes the merge window.
I see, there are for-linus tags in the series file, this is what
got me worried.
> I also want to find a few cycles to adapt lguest; it's *always* good to
> have a second implementation.
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
Absolutely.
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.40 event idx patches
2011-05-25 2:04 ` Rusty Russell
2011-05-25 6:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2011-05-28 19:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-05-28 19:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2011-05-28 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: virtualization
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:34:07AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 12:23:45 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Just checking: were you going to send the following to Linus for 2.6.40?
> > virtio:event_index_interface.patch
> > virtio:ring_inline_function_to_check_for_events.patch
> > virtio:ring_support_event_idx_feature.patch
> > misc:vhost_support_event_index.patch
> > virtio:test_support_event_index.patch
> > virtio:add_api_for_delayed_callbacks.patch
> > virtio:net_delay_tx_callbacks.patch
> >
> > I certainly hope so as these modify both host and guest which makes
> > testing them out of tree hard for people.
> > Once stuff lands on Linus' tree we can patch
> > qemu and get more people to try out the patches.
> >
> > Also, Linus said it's going to be a short window so ...
>
> Yes. They've been in linux-next since the weekend (ie. today will be the
> third linux-next build), and my plan was to push them Friday.
>
> Nothing goes into linux-next which is not for Linus until after Linus
> closes the merge window.
>
> I also want to find a few cycles to adapt lguest; it's *always* good to
> have a second implementation.
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
Couldn't find any pull requests at lkml, and I read the window will
likely close May 29. Did you end up not sending it, or did I miss it?
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.40 event idx patches
2011-05-28 19:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2011-05-28 19:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2011-05-28 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: virtualization
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:34:26PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:34:07AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 May 2011 12:23:45 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Just checking: were you going to send the following to Linus for 2.6.40?
> > > virtio:event_index_interface.patch
> > > virtio:ring_inline_function_to_check_for_events.patch
> > > virtio:ring_support_event_idx_feature.patch
> > > misc:vhost_support_event_index.patch
> > > virtio:test_support_event_index.patch
> > > virtio:add_api_for_delayed_callbacks.patch
> > > virtio:net_delay_tx_callbacks.patch
> > >
> > > I certainly hope so as these modify both host and guest which makes
> > > testing them out of tree hard for people.
> > > Once stuff lands on Linus' tree we can patch
> > > qemu and get more people to try out the patches.
> > >
> > > Also, Linus said it's going to be a short window so ...
> >
> > Yes. They've been in linux-next since the weekend (ie. today will be the
> > third linux-next build), and my plan was to push them Friday.
> >
> > Nothing goes into linux-next which is not for Linus until after Linus
> > closes the merge window.
> >
> > I also want to find a few cycles to adapt lguest; it's *always* good to
> > have a second implementation.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rusty.
>
> Couldn't find any pull requests at lkml, and I read the window will
> likely close May 29. Did you end up not sending it, or did I miss it?
Pls ignore, problem at my end.
Thanks, and sorry about the noise.
> --
> MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-28 19:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-24 9:23 2.6.40 event idx patches Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-05-25 2:04 ` Rusty Russell
2011-05-25 6:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-05-28 19:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-05-28 19:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).