From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/40] Staging: hv: storvsc: Add state to manage the lifecycle of emulated HBA Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:44:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20110630194421.GD22707@infradead.org> References: <1309358301-8488-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <1309358377-8537-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <1309358377-8537-25-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1309358377-8537-25-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Haiyang Zhang , Abhishek Kane , Hank Janssen List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org I think all this would be a lot simpler if you simply used one scsi host per ide device as mentioned before. Also it would be nice if you could sent patches 23 to 28 as one patch in the next round, as that allows reviewing the whole IDE related code in one go, which is useful given that it's all interwinded.