From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [TOME] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 07:48:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20110705144846.GA13548__39346.3343535133$1309877403$gmane$org@dumpdata.com> References: <20110703232508.GB4440@Xye> <1309769388.634.51.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20110704221646.GB4490@Xye> <20110705141323.GG2972@dumpdata.com> <20110705142731.GA4463@Xye> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110705142731.GA4463@Xye> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Raghavendra D Prabhu Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org > >>xen_register_gsi and hence, xen_register_pirq are called from > >>init (with xen_setup_acpi_sci) and non-init (with > >>acpi_register_gsi_xen); since xen_set_acpi_sci calls it with gsi == > >>acpi_sci_override_gsi and is marked __init, the best way would be to > >>call xen_register_gsi and xen_register_pirq with a boolean argument like > >>sci_override to obviate the need to use acpi_sci_override_gsi in > >>register_pirq. I will send the patch with this change if it looks good. > > > >Hold on, let me rebase #stable/pci.cleanups and see if the issue > >here disappears. > Thanks, will wait until the rebase and test after that. Hm, it actually looks like it wont do the trick. Why don't you send a patch against 3.0-rc6 with the outlined mechanism mentioned above.