From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: flexible configuration layout Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:11:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20111103121139.GF18296@redhat.com> References: <87wrbkvh3v.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20111101114542.GA13434@redhat.com> <1320150813.3847.24.camel@lappy> <20111101124223.GA14060@redhat.com> <8739e7uy87.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20111102233110.GA20289@redhat.com> <4EB26ED0.3080409@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EB26ED0.3080409@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Avi Kivity Cc: Krishna Kumar , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll , Wang Sheng-Hui , Alexey Kardashevskiy , lkml - Kernel Mailing List , Jesse Barnes , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Christian Borntraeger , Sasha Levin , Amit Shah , Linus Torvalds List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:37:04PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 11/03/2011 01:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Add a flexible mechanism to specify virtio configuration layout, using > > pci vendor-specific capability. A separate capability is used for each > > of common, device specific and data-path accesses. > > > > > > How about posting the spec change instead of patches? We need both of course but I typically start with patches. Easier to see whether it's even possible to implement the spec without overhauling all of the code. > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function