From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: fix a race on 32bit arches
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 23:43:35 +0300
Message-ID: <20120606204335.GA23552@redhat.com>
References: <20120606111357.GA15070@redhat.com>
	<1338988210.2760.4485.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<20120606144941.GA17092@redhat.com>
	<20120606081432.6b602065@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
	<20120606185107.GA20503@redhat.com>
	<1339012441.26966.48.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<20120606195814.GA20677@redhat.com>
	<1339013289.26966.62.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<20120606201620.GA23358@redhat.com>
	<1339014904.2836.56.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1339014904.2836.56.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 09:35:04PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 23:16 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:08:09PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 22:58 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Absolutely, I am talking about virtio here.  I'm not kicking
> > > > u64_stats_sync idea I am just saying that simple locking
> > > > would work for virtio and might be better as it
> > > > gives us a way to get counters atomically.
> > > 
> > > Which lock do you own in the RX path ?
> > 
> > We can just disable napi, everything is updated from napi callback.
> 
> Seriously, though: don't do that; this is going to hurt performance for
> minimal benefit.
> 
> Ben.

Yea, it doesn't work anyway. Maybe take a xmit lock for tx and keep
using the per-cpu counters for rx. Or does this sound too disruptive
too?

> > > You'll have to add a lock in fast path. This sounds really a bad choice
> > > to me.
> > 
> > .ndo_get_stats64 is not data path though, is it?
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
> Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
> They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.