From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: RFD: virtio balloon API use (was Re: [PATCH 5 of 5] virtio: expose added descriptors immediately) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 13:55:33 +0300 Message-ID: <20120704105533.GB21704@redhat.com> References: <20120701092051.GA4515@redhat.com> <87d34fx990.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20120702072558.GA8268@redhat.com> <20120702160814.GB1750@t510.redhat.com> <87vci5wtzh.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vci5wtzh.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: virtualization , Rafael Aquini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:17:46AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:08:19 -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote: > > As 'locking in balloon', may I assume the approach I took for the compaction case > > is OK and aligned to address these concerns of yours? If not, do not hesitate in > > giving me your thoughts, please. I'm respinning a V3 series to address a couple > > of extra nitpicks from the compaction standpoint, and I'd love to be able to > > address any extra concern you might have on the balloon side of that work. > > It's orthogonal, though looks like they clash textually :( > > I'll re-spin MST's patch on top of yours, and include both in my tree, > otherwise linux-next will have to do the merge. But I'll await your > push before pushing to Linus next merge window. > > Thanks, > Rusty. While theoretical mine is a bugfix so could be 3.5 material, no? -- MST