From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
sjur@brendeland.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] virtio_console: Free buffers from out-queue upon close
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 09:59:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121108085913.GA31962@amit.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sj8l2cea.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
On (Thu) 08 Nov 2012 [10:28:53], Rusty Russell wrote:
> sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com writes:
>
> > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
> >
> > Free pending output buffers from the virtio out-queue when
> > host has acknowledged port_close. Also removed WARN_ON()
> > in remove_port_data().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Resending, this time including a proper "Subject"...
> > --
> >
> > Hi Amit,
> >
> > Note: This patch is compile tested only. I have done the removal
> > of buffers from out-queue in handle_control_message()
> > when host has acked the close request. This seems less
> > racy than doing it in the release function.
>
> This confuses me... why are we doing this in case
> VIRTIO_CONSOLE_PORT_OPEN:?
>
> We can't pull unconsumed buffers out of the ring when the other side may
> still access it, and this seems to be doing that.
Yes -- and it's my fault; I asked Sjur to do that in the close fops
function.
We should only do this in the port remove case (unplug or device
remove) -- so the original patch, with just the WARN_ON removed is the
right way.
I'll send the revised 3/3 patch for you.
Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-08 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-15 7:57 [PATCHv7 0/4] virtio_console: Add rproc_serial driver sjur.brandeland
2012-10-15 7:57 ` [PATCHv7 1/4] virtio_console: Free buffer if splice fails sjur.brandeland
2012-10-15 7:57 ` [PATCHv7 2/4] virtio_console: Use kmalloc instead of kzalloc sjur.brandeland
2012-10-23 1:36 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-15 7:57 ` [PATCHv7 3/4] virtio_console: Merge struct buffer_token into struct port_buffer sjur.brandeland
2012-10-23 0:19 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-15 7:57 ` [PATCHv7 4/4] virtio_console: Add support for remoteproc serial sjur.brandeland
2012-10-23 1:47 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <878vayhsca.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-10-28 21:58 ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-11-01 7:39 ` Amit Shah
[not found] ` <20121101073951.GA17012@amit.redhat.com>
2012-11-01 23:22 ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-02 10:20 ` Amit Shah
2012-11-02 10:44 ` Sjur BRENDELAND
2012-11-07 14:22 ` sjur.brandeland
2012-11-07 13:43 ` [PATCH resend] virtio_console: Free buffers from out-queue upon close sjur.brandeland
2012-11-07 23:58 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <87sj8l2cea.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-11-08 8:59 ` Amit Shah [this message]
2012-11-08 9:25 ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-10-22 13:00 ` [PATCHv7 0/4] virtio_console: Add rproc_serial driver Amit Shah
[not found] ` <1350287856-5284-2-git-send-email-sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
2012-10-23 0:12 ` [PATCHv7 1/4] virtio_console: Free buffer if splice fails Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121108085913.GA31962@amit.redhat.com \
--to=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com \
--cc=sjur@brendeland.net \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).