virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:53:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121128085305.2b0503ce@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B5B3D4.1070106@redhat.com>

On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
> >>> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
> >>>> (usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
> >>>> virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the next packet sending. This
> >>>> would lead the pktgen to wait forever in the refcount of the skb if no other
> >>>> pakcet will be sent afterwards.
> >>>>
> >>>> Solving this issue by introducing a new flag IFF_TX_SKB_FREE_DELAY which could
> >>>> notify the pktgen that the device does not free skb immediately after it has
> >>>> been sent and let it not to wait for the refcount to be one.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> >>> Another alternative would be using skb_orphan() and skb->destructor.
> >>> There are other cases where skb's are not freed right away.
> >>> --
> >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >> Hi Stephen:
> >>
> >> Do you mean registering a skb->destructor for pktgen then set and check
> >> bits in skb->tx_flag?
> > Yes. Register a destructor that does something like update a counter (number of packets pending),
> > then just spin while number of packets pending is over threshold.
> > --
> 
> Not sure this is the best method, since pktgen was used to test the tx 
> process of the device driver and NIC. If we use skb_orhpan(), we would 
> miss the test of tx completion part.

There are other places that delay freeing and your solution would mean finding
and fixing all those. Code that does that already has to use skb_orphan() to
work, and I was looking for a way that could use that. Introducing another flag
value seems like a long term burden.

Alternatively, virtio could do cleanup more aggressively. Maybe in response to
ring getting half full, or add a cleanup timer or something to avoid the problem.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-28 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-26  7:56 [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent Jason Wang
2012-11-26 17:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-27  6:45   ` Jason Wang
2012-11-27 16:49     ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-28  6:48       ` Jason Wang
2012-11-28 16:53         ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2012-11-29 10:13           ` Jason Wang
2012-11-29 11:30             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-11-29 17:21               ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-12-03  6:45       ` Jason Wang
     [not found]       ` <2663254.1vRFru9xhh@jason-thinkpad-t430s>
2012-12-03 16:01         ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-12-04 12:55           ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121128085305.2b0503ce@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
    --to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).