From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Sjur BRENDELAND <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
Cc: "Sjur Brændeland" <sjur@brendeland.net>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 04/12] virtio-ring: Refactor out the functions accessing user memory
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:15:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121206111540.GJ10837@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81C3A93C17462B4BBD7E272753C105792457512701@EXDCVYMBSTM005.EQ1STM.local>
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:03:43PM +0100, Sjur BRENDELAND wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> > > -struct vring_used_elem *vring_add_used_user(struct vring_host *vh,
> > > - unsigned int head, int len)
> > > +
> > > +static inline struct vring_used_elem *_vring_add_used(struct vring_host
> > *vh,
> > > + u32 head, u32 len,
> > > + bool (*cpy)(void *dst,
> > > + void *src,
> > > + size_t s),
> > > + void (*wbarrier)(void))
> > > {
> > > struct vring_used_elem *used;
> > > + u16 last_used;
> > >
> > > /* The virtqueue contains a ring of used buffers. Get a pointer to the
> > > * next entry in that used ring. */
> > > - used = &vh->vr.used->ring[vh->last_used_idx % vh->vr.num];
> > > - if (__put_user(head, &used->id)) {
> > > - pr_debug("Failed to write used id");
> > > + used = &vh->vr.used->ring[vh->last_used_idx & (vh->vr.num - 1)];
> > > + if (!cpy(&used->id, &head, sizeof(used->id)) ||
> > > + !cpy(&used->len, &len, sizeof(used->len)))
> > > return NULL;
> > > - }
> > > - if (__put_user(len, &used->len)) {
> > > - pr_debug("Failed to write used len");
> > > + wbarrier();
> > > + last_used = vh->last_used_idx + 1;
> > > + if (!cpy(&vh->vr.used->idx, &last_used, sizeof(vh->vr.used->idx)))
> > > return NULL;
> >
> > I think this is broken: we need a 16 bit access, this is
> > doing a memcpy which is byte by byte.
>
> I have played around with gcc and -O2 option, and it seems to me
> that GCC is smart enough to optimize the use of sizeof and memcpy
> into MOV operations. But my assembly knowledge is very rusty,
> so a second opinion on this would be good.
Yes but I don't think we should rely on this: this API is not guaranteed
to do the right thing and no one will bother telling us if it's
rewritten or something.
> > > - }
> > > - /* Make sure buffer is written before we update index. */
> > > - smp_wmb();
> > > - if (__put_user(vh->last_used_idx + 1, &vh->vr.used->idx)) {
> > > - pr_debug("Failed to increment used idx");
> > > - return NULL;
> > > - }
> > > - vh->last_used_idx++;
> > > + vh->last_used_idx = last_used;
> > > return used;
> > > }
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(vring_add_used_user);
>
> Thanks,
> Sjur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-06 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-31 22:46 [RFC virtio-next 0/4] Introduce CAIF Virtio and reversed Vrings Sjur Brændeland
2012-10-31 22:46 ` [RFC virtio-next 1/4] virtio: Move definitions to header file vring.h Sjur Brændeland
2012-10-31 22:46 ` [RFC virtio-next 2/4] include/vring.h: Add support for reversed vritio rings Sjur Brændeland
2012-10-31 22:46 ` [RFC virtio-next 3/4] virtio_ring: Call callback function even when used ring is empty Sjur Brændeland
2012-10-31 22:46 ` [RFC virtio-next 4/4] caif_virtio: Add CAIF over virtio Sjur Brændeland
2012-11-01 7:41 ` [RFC virtio-next 0/4] Introduce CAIF Virtio and reversed Vrings Rusty Russell
2012-11-05 12:12 ` Sjur Brændeland
[not found] ` <CANHm3PgrsTD4uYuXN0AMuZFX794CJmmus4AST=G0+nP1ha3VyQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-06 2:09 ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-05 14:36 ` [RFCv2 00/12] Introduce host-side virtio queue and CAIF Virtio Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-05 14:36 ` [RFCv2 01/12] vhost: Use struct vring in vhost_virtqueue Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-05 14:37 ` [RFCv2 02/12] vhost: Isolate reusable vring related functions Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-05 14:37 ` [RFCv2 03/12] virtio-ring: Introduce file virtio_ring_host Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-05 14:37 ` [RFCv2 04/12] virtio-ring: Refactor out the functions accessing user memory Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-06 9:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-06 11:03 ` Sjur BRENDELAND
2012-12-06 11:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2012-12-07 11:05 ` Sjur BRENDELAND
2012-12-07 12:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-07 13:02 ` Sjur BRENDELAND
2012-12-07 14:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-05 14:37 ` [RFCv2 05/12] virtio-ring: Refactor move attributes to struct virtqueue Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-05 14:37 ` [RFCv2 06/12] virtio_ring: Move SMP macros to virtio_ring.h Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-05 14:37 ` [RFCv2 07/12] virtio-ring: Add Host side virtio-ring implementation Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-05 14:37 ` [RFCv2 08/12] virtio: Update vring_interrupt for host-side virtio queues Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-05 14:37 ` [RFCv2 09/12] virtio-ring: Add BUG_ON checking on host/guest ring type Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-05 14:37 ` [RFCv2 10/12] virtio: Add argument reversed to function find_vqs() Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-05 14:37 ` [RFCv2 11/12] remoteproc: Add support for host-virtqueues Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-05 14:37 ` [RFCv2 12/12] caif_virtio: Introduce caif over virtio Sjur Brændeland
2012-12-06 10:27 ` [RFCv2 00/12] Introduce host-side virtio queue and CAIF Virtio Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-21 6:11 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-08 8:04 ` Sjur Brændeland
2013-01-08 23:17 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-10 10:30 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-10 11:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-10 22:48 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-11 7:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20130111073155.GA13315@redhat.com>
2013-01-12 0:20 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-14 16:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-10 18:39 ` Sjur Brændeland
2013-01-10 23:35 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-11 6:37 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-11 15:02 ` Sjur Brændeland
2013-01-12 0:26 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-14 17:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-16 3:13 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-16 8:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-17 2:10 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <87k3rcy2y2.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
2013-01-17 9:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-21 11:55 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-17 10:35 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-11 14:52 ` Sjur Brændeland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121206111540.GJ10837@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com \
--cc=sjur@brendeland.net \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).