From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amit Shah Subject: Re: [[PATCH v9 3/3] 1/1] virtio_console: Remove buffers from out_vq at port removal Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:24:01 +0530 Message-ID: <20121210055401.GA17187@amit.redhat.com> References: <029d7029bc1186fbd2ec74123dc88922b9600660.1352366215.git.amit.shah@redhat.com> <87ip96id3a.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ip96id3a.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , sjur@brendeland.net, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, Sjur =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=E6ndeland?= List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On (Fri) 16 Nov 2012 [11:22:09], Rusty Russell wrote: > Amit Shah writes: > > From: Sjur Br=E6ndeland > > > > Remove buffers from the out-queue when a port is removed. Rproc_serial > > communicates with remote processors that may crash and leave buffers in > > the out-queue. The virtio serial ports may have buffers in the out-queue > > as well, e.g. for non-blocking ports and the host didn't consume them > > yet. > > > > [Amit: Remove WARN_ON for generic ports case.] > > > > Signed-off-by: Sjur Br=E6ndeland > > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah > = > I already have this in my pending queue; I've promoted it to my > virtio-next branch now. Rusty, I still see this series in your pending queue, not in virtio-next. Did anything change in the meantime? Amit