From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amit Shah Subject: Re: [[PATCH v9 3/3] 1/1] virtio_console: Remove buffers from out_vq at port removal Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:40:12 +0530 Message-ID: <20121211041012.GA16297@amit.redhat.com> References: <029d7029bc1186fbd2ec74123dc88922b9600660.1352366215.git.amit.shah@redhat.com> <87ip96id3a.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20121210055401.GA17187@amit.redhat.com> <871uexec7e.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871uexec7e.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , sjur@brendeland.net, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, Sjur =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=E6ndeland?= List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On (Tue) 11 Dec 2012 [09:39:41], Rusty Russell wrote: > Amit Shah writes: > = > > On (Fri) 16 Nov 2012 [11:22:09], Rusty Russell wrote: > >> Amit Shah writes: > >> > From: Sjur Br=E6ndeland > >> > > >> > Remove buffers from the out-queue when a port is removed. Rproc_seri= al > >> > communicates with remote processors that may crash and leave buffers= in > >> > the out-queue. The virtio serial ports may have buffers in the out-q= ueue > >> > as well, e.g. for non-blocking ports and the host didn't consume them > >> > yet. > >> > > >> > [Amit: Remove WARN_ON for generic ports case.] > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Sjur Br=E6ndeland > >> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah > >> = > >> I already have this in my pending queue; I've promoted it to my > >> virtio-next branch now. > > > > Rusty, I still see this series in your pending queue, not in > > virtio-next. Did anything change in the meantime? > = > Hmm: > = > 40e625ac50f40d87ddba93280d0a503425aa68e9? I'm sorry, I meant the remoteproc code, not this patch. Amit