virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: Don't free ida when disk is in use
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:38:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121220113853.GA3909@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62D6A704-CB88-4A8C-A5F3-6BD3C267895F@suse.de>

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:27:53PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 20.12.2012, at 11:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:40:15PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> When a file system is mounted on a virtio-blk disk, we then remove it
> >> and then reattach it, the reattached disk gets the same disk name and
> >> ids as the hot removed one.
> >> 
> >> This leads to very nasty effects - mostly rendering the newly attached
> >> device completely unusable.
> >> 
> >> Trying what happens when I do the same thing with a USB device, I saw
> >> that the sd node simply doesn't get free'd when a device gets forcefully
> >> removed.
> >> 
> >> Imitate the same behavior for vd devices. This way broken vd devices
> >> simply are never free'd and newly attached ones keep working just fine.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 7 ++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> >> index 0bdde8f..07a18e2 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> >> @@ -889,6 +889,7 @@ static void __devexit virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >> {
> >> 	struct virtio_blk *vblk = vdev->priv;
> >> 	int index = vblk->index;
> >> +	int refc;
> >> 
> >> 	/* Prevent config work handler from accessing the device. */
> >> 	mutex_lock(&vblk->config_lock);
> >> @@ -903,11 +904,15 @@ static void __devexit virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >> 
> >> 	flush_work(&vblk->config_work);
> >> 
> >> +	refc = atomic_read(&disk_to_dev(vblk->disk)->kobj.kref.refcount);
> >> 	put_disk(vblk->disk);
> >> 	mempool_destroy(vblk->pool);
> >> 	vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> >> 	kfree(vblk);
> >> -	ida_simple_remove(&vd_index_ida, index);
> >> +
> >> +	/* Only free device id if we don't have any users */
> >> +	if (refc == 1)
> >> +		ida_simple_remove(&vd_index_ida, index);
> >> }
> >> 
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > 
> > Network devices take the approach of retrying every second.
> > Donnu if it makes sense here.
> 
> I would rather think the 100% right approach would be a recursive unrolling of all users bottom to top. Force unmount. Force close all fd's.
> I'm not sure why that doesn't happen today, but it doesn't :).
> 
> 
> Alex

Especially force close fd's won't be easy. A simpler alternative
would be preventing unplug by taking some reference count.

-- 
MST

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-20 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-19 19:40 [PATCH] virtio-blk: Don't free ida when disk is in use Alexander Graf
2012-12-20  4:15 ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-20  8:46   ` Asias He
2012-12-20  9:41     ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-21  1:48       ` Asias He
2013-01-02  5:09       ` Rusty Russell
2012-12-20 10:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-20 11:27   ` Alexander Graf
     [not found]   ` <62D6A704-CB88-4A8C-A5F3-6BD3C267895F@suse.de>
2012-12-20 11:38     ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2012-12-20 11:47       ` Alexander Graf
2012-12-21  2:02         ` Asias He
2012-12-21  1:58     ` Asias He
2012-12-21  1:57   ` Asias He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121220113853.GA3909@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).