From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm: Make ioeventfd usable on s390.
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:05:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130226150550.21888bff@gondolin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130226135643.GA12379@redhat.com>
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:56:43 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:29:07PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:13:39 +0100
> > Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 26/02/13 12:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > virtio_ccw: pass a cookie value to kvm hypercall
> > > >
> > > > Lookups by channel/vq pair on host during virtio notifications might be
> > > > expensive. Interpret hypercall return value as a cookie which host can
> > > > use to do device lookups for the next notification more efficiently.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > index 2029b6c..1054f3a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct virtio_ccw_vq_info {
> > > > void *queue;
> > > > struct vq_info_block *info_block;
> > > > struct list_head node;
> > > > + long cookie;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > #define KVM_VIRTIO_CCW_RING_ALIGN 4096
> > > > @@ -145,15 +146,18 @@ static int ccw_io_helper(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static inline long do_kvm_notify(struct subchannel_id schid,
> > > > - unsigned long queue_index)
> > > > + unsigned long queue_index,
> > > > + long cookie)
> > > > {
> > > > register unsigned long __nr asm("1") = KVM_S390_VIRTIO_CCW_NOTIFY;
> > > > register struct subchannel_id __schid asm("2") = schid;
> > > > register unsigned long __index asm("3") = queue_index;
> > > > register long __rc asm("2");
> > > > + register long __cookie asm("4") = cookie;
> > > >
> > > > asm volatile ("diag 2,4,0x500\n"
> > > > - : "=d" (__rc) : "d" (__nr), "d" (__schid), "d" (__index)
> > > > + : "=d" (__rc) : "d" (__nr), "d" (__schid), "d" (__index),
> > > > + "d"(__cookie)
> > > > : "memory", "cc");
> > > > return __rc;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -166,7 +170,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_kvm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > > >
> > > > vcdev = to_vc_device(info->vq->vdev);
> > > > ccw_device_get_schid(vcdev->cdev, &schid);
> > > > - do_kvm_notify(schid, virtqueue_get_queue_index(vq));
> > > > + info->cookie = do_kvm_notify(schid, virtqueue_get_queue_index(vq), info->cookie);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static int virtio_ccw_read_vq_conf(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
> > >
> > >
> > > Hmmm, forget my last mail. This actually could be even forward and backward compatible.
> > > In the virtio spec we will not define the cookie format (just 64bit int). That will allow
> > > qemu or future kernels to use that for other things (as long as a validity check is
> > > possible) if we dont have a kvm bus.
> > >
> > > Now:
> > >
> > > old guest, old host:
> > > works.
> > >
> > > old guest, new host:
> > > the cookie from the guest contains junk, the host needs to detect that the cookie is
> > > junk and ignores it. It will return the new cookie anyway.
> > >
> > > new guest, old host:
> > > The guest will get a junk cookie and pass it back to the host. But the host will ignore
> > > it anyway.
> > >
> > > new guest, new host:
> > > works.
> > >
> > > So...
> > > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> >
> > Yes, that sounds sane; I'll give it a try later.
> >
> > However, I'd rather not want to rush this; I'd prefer to get the
> > initial version in first.
>
> Well planning to obsolete an interface from the start sounds wrong
> somehow. We could always drop ccw in 3.9 if we feel we need more
> time, but to me, this looks like a minor enough change to do even after
> the merge window closed.
This was aimed at the exploitation; I'm fine with this patch for 3.9
after we let it mature for a day or two.
>
> Want me to write you a spec patch too?
That would be great.
>
> > I'll do a v4 later.
>
> Right, just return 0 and it'll work.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-26 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1361806070-62465-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
2013-02-26 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm: Make ioeventfd usable on s390 Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-26 11:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-26 11:54 ` Christian Borntraeger
2013-02-26 12:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2013-02-26 13:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2013-02-26 13:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-26 13:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2013-02-26 13:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20130226142907.3a38659f@gondolin>
2013-02-26 13:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-26 14:05 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2013-02-27 19:49 ` Christian Borntraeger
2013-03-07 18:02 ` virtio-s390: document GPR4/GPR2 cookie values Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-03-08 7:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2013-03-12 3:47 ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-26 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm: Make ioeventfd usable on s390 Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130226150550.21888bff@gondolin \
--to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).