From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Asias He Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] virtqueue_add_sgs, virtqueue_add_outbuf, virtqueue_add_inbuf Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:01:44 +0800 Message-ID: <20130320060144.GA28683@hj.localdomain> References: <1363599293-23065-1-git-send-email-rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <87mwtyprz2.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mwtyprz2.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: Paolo Bonzini , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:50:33PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > Rusty Russell writes: > > Add virtqueue_add_sgs which is more general than virtqueue_add_buf, > > which makes virtio-scsi and virtio-blk nicer, then add virtqueue_add_inbuf > > and virtqueue_add_outbuf which handle the more general case, and finally > > delete virtqueue_add_buf(). > > > > I'm hoping this will be the final post of the whole series, and it can > > move from my pending-rebases tree into virtio-next. > > OK, thanks for the feedback, reviews and corrections everyone. > > I folded the following patches into one commit: > > Subject: [PATCH 02/22] virtio_ring: virtqueue_add_sgs, to add multiple sgs. > Subject: [PATCH 03/22] virtio_ring: don't count elements twice for add_buf path. > Subject: [PATCH 04/22] virtio_ring: inline internal vring functions more aggres > > I've put it into virtio-next, so please send any further fixes as diffs > against that. Cheers! -- Asias