From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:25:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20131111122537.5c3192d2@gandalf.local.home> References: <20131108125213.19972.49271.stgit@kbuild-fedora.novalocal> <20131111111618.GA15810@gmail.com> <5281117D.3010202@hitachi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5281117D.3010202@hitachi.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: x86@kernel.org, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , "David S. Miller" , Peter Zijlstra , lkml , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series. > > OK, I'll do. :) > BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs, which > kprobes ported. In that case, which mailing-list would better me > to post the series, linux-arch? I would add linux-arch. Note, you may need to support both ways for the current time being, as new __kprobes are being added (I've seen several in patches flying by in LKML). But perhaps at a later -rc we convert the rest and discontinue them. That way, linux-next will break all new __kprobes, and that should get them fixed before we enter 3.14-rc. -- Steve