virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jason@lakedaemon.net, keescook@chromium.org,
	Virtualization List <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] virtio: rng: delay hwrng_register() till driver is ready
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:38:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722170834.GA23129@grmbl.mre> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91cb7c5b87cf2ba5ef1bacd55a7ee7bc827293a2.1405942162.git.amit.shah@redhat.com>

On (Mon) 21 Jul 2014 [17:15:51], Amit Shah wrote:
> Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the
> scan routine.  This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful,
> and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init,
> we're ready to service that request.
> 
> This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to
> check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the
> host.  The revert follows in the next commit.
> 
> There's a slight behaviour change here on unsuccessful hwrng_register().
> Previously, when hwrng_unregister() failed, the probe() routine would

typo: should be hwrng_register().

Please fix this up when picking up the patch.

Thanks,

> fail, and the vqs would be torn down, and driver would be marked not
> initialized.  Now, the vqs will remain initialized, driver would be
> marked initialized as well, but won't be available in the list of RNGs
> available to hwrng core.  To fix the failures, the procedure remains the
> same, i.e. unload and re-load the module, and hope things succeed the
> next time around.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>

		Amit

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-22 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-21 11:45 [PATCH v2 0/4] virtio-rng: contribute to early randomness requests Amit Shah
2014-07-21 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] virtio: rng: remove unused struct element Amit Shah
2014-07-21 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] virtio: rng: re-arrange struct elements for better packing Amit Shah
2014-07-21 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] virtio: rng: delay hwrng_register() till driver is ready Amit Shah
2014-07-21 12:11   ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-21 12:21     ` Amit Shah
2014-07-21 12:41     ` Herbert Xu
2014-07-22 11:43       ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-22 17:08   ` Amit Shah [this message]
2014-07-23  5:51     ` Rusty Russell
2014-07-21 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Revert "hwrng: virtio - ensure reads happen after successful probe" Amit Shah
2014-07-22 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] virtio-rng: contribute to early randomness requests Jason Cooper
2014-07-22 15:08   ` Amit Shah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140722170834.GA23129@grmbl.mre \
    --to=amit.shah@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).