From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio_net: enable tx interrupt Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 02:11:54 +0300 Message-ID: <20141014231154.GA23806@redhat.com> References: <1413323524-23380-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1413323524-23380-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:53:59AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtqueue *vq) > { > struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv; > + struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[vq2txq(vq)]; > > - /* Suppress further interrupts. */ > - virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); > - One note here: current code seems racy because of doing virtqueue_disable_cb from skb_xmit_done that I'm dropping here: there's no guarantee we don't get an interrupt while tx ring is running, and if that happens we can end up with interrupts disabled forever. > - /* We were probably waiting for more output buffers. */ > - netif_wake_subqueue(vi->dev, vq2txq(vq)); > + if (napi_schedule_prep(&sq->napi)) { > + __napi_schedule(&sq->napi); > + } > } > > static unsigned int mergeable_ctx_to_buf_truesize(unsigned long mrg_ctx)