From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio: change comment in transmit
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:34:55 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325.003455.923244010335019144.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y4mlhglx.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:29:38 +1030
> I note that there's still no comment saying "don't do this" in
> netdevice.h; I gather returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY is still considered a Bad
> Thing?
You're not supposed to do it still, that's right.
If the driver returns NETDEV_TX_BUSY it means that it is not
maintaining the TX queues stop/start state properly.
It was kept around for drivers that we didn't want to convert
or fix up at the time (this is circa two decades ago).
I realize that there are situations for some devices where this is
difficult to achieve, but the stack really does a non-trivial amount
of useless work if you don't play along nicely.
If you grep drivers/net for it, the majority of the returns are in
assertion failure paths in the TX handler of those drivers.
NETDEV_TX_BUSY is not being returned in a normal path of operation.
> (Does it really BUG_ON?)
No, it doesn't.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-25 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20150324162207.6d4ecf48@urahara>
2015-03-25 1:23 ` [PATCH net-next] virtio: change comment in transmit David Miller
2015-03-25 3:59 ` Rusty Russell
2015-03-25 4:34 ` David Miller [this message]
2015-03-24 23:22 Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150325.003455.923244010335019144.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox