virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost_net: basic polling support
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:43:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151201163939-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565D2D7D.4010903@redhat.com>

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:17:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/30/2015 06:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:11:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> > This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive
> >> > queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time
> >> > spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl.
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > One further enhancement would be to actually poll
> > the underlying device. This should be reasonably
> > straight-forward with macvtap (especially in the
> > passthrough mode).
> >
> >
> 
> Yes, it is. I have some patches to do this by replacing
> skb_queue_empty() with sk_busy_loop() but for tap.

We probably don't want to do this unconditionally, though.

> Tests does not show
> any improvement but some regression.

Did you add code to call sk_mark_napi_id on tap then?
sk_busy_loop won't do anything useful without.

>  Maybe it's better to test macvtap.

Same thing ...

-- 
MST

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-01 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-25  7:11 [PATCH net-next 0/3] basic busy polling support for vhost_net Jason Wang
2015-11-25  7:11 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] vhost: introduce vhost_has_work() Jason Wang
2015-11-25  7:11 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] vhost: introduce vhost_vq_more_avail() Jason Wang
2015-11-30  8:22   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
     [not found]   ` <20151130082202.GA7396@redhat.com>
2015-12-01  5:14     ` Jason Wang
2015-11-25  7:11 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost_net: basic polling support Jason Wang
2015-11-30 10:44   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-12-01  5:17     ` Jason Wang
     [not found]     ` <565D2D7D.4010903@redhat.com>
2015-12-01 14:43       ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2015-12-02  5:04         ` Jason Wang
     [not found]         ` <565E7BC3.2060107@redhat.com>
2015-12-02 12:36           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
     [not found]           ` <20151202143522-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
2015-12-04  2:24             ` Jason Wang
2015-11-30  3:31 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] basic busy polling support for vhost_net David Miller
2015-11-30  8:22   ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151201163939-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).